Yokosuka isn't alone in
having
problems with toxic wasteBy Steve Liewer
Yokosuka bureau chief
Yokosuka
Naval Base is not unique in finding toxic secrets in its soil.
The
Department of Defense has at least 1,800 toxic waste sites in the United States alone,
said Saul Bloom, director of ArcEcology, a San Francisco consultant on hazardous military
waste. There are dozens, maybe hundreds, more sites overseas.
"There
is not a (U.S.) military base in the world that doesnt have some soil or groundwater
contamination. That is just a given," Gary Vest, the principal assistant deputy
undersecretary of defense for environmental security, told the Boston Globe in 1999.
"I will stipulate there is contamination everywhere."
For Patrick
Lynch, an environmental engineer who started the consulting firm Clearwater Revival Co.,
the topic quite literally hits close to home. He lives just 200 feet from the former
Alameda Point Naval Air Station, Calif., and his company is now working to clean the place
up.
According
to his companys Web site, www.toxicspot.com,
at least 25 hazardous-waste sites have been discovered on the 2,700-acre base, which was
repeatedly cited for environmental violations before its closure in 1997.
Lynch said
more fuel was spilled there during the air stations 58-year history than was spilled
by the tanker Exxon Valdez in 1989.
That
accident, which occurred when the tanker hit a reef in Prince William Sound, Alaska,
spilled 11 million gallons of oil.
The United
States also left behind horrific messes at Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Base when
the Philippines government cancelled U.S. leases in 1991, Lynch said. The bases became
heavily industrialized with airfields, ship repair docks, and petroleum tanks all
of which generate significant amounts of hazardous waste, he said.
After the
eruption of Mount Pinatubo, thousands of refugees moved onto a site once occupied by
Clarks motor pool.
According
to a 1999 Boston Globe investigation, many children became sick after drinking water from
a well contaminated with mercury, gasoline and bacteria.
The Globe
said pollution at Subic has not been studied as thoroughly at Clark, but toxic waste has
been discovered in at least 10 places, and the U.S. is known to have pumped millions of
gallons a day of untreated sewage into the bay. To complicate matters further, the
Philippines own pollution standards are weak and unevenly enforced.
Lynch said
the United States did little to clean up the bases before they left, and took with them
most records about their activities there. So far, the United States has not contributed
to cleanup efforts as it has at former bases in Europe and Japan.
Bloom said
much of the damage at military bases was inflicted during World War II and in the decades
following, when the Department of Defense knew little about the hazards. At sites in
Japan, clean-up is even more complicated. Often the source of a spill is impossible to
determine because the the bases were controlled by the Japanese until 1945.
"Oftentimes
these records have been lost or misplaced," he said.
Until 1991,
U.S. domestic bases werent required to follow environmental laws. Since then, Bloom
said, the military has become much more ecologically sensitive. But it also has been
overwhelmed by the scope of the job, and by its own red tape.
"Were
spending a ton of money on clean-up projects," he said.
Back to January's stories
Stories from December, 2000
Stories from November, 2000
Stories from October, 2000
Stories from August and September, 2000
Stories from June and July, 2000
Home |