USS Kitty Hawk has changed
response-time proceduresBy Sandra Jontz and Steve Liewer
Stars and Stripes
WASHINGTON The Navy aircraft carrier USS
Kitty Hawk changed its response-time procedures dealing with aircraft flyovers following
an incident in which two Russian fighter planes flew just hundreds of feet directly over
the ships deck, a Pentagon spokesman said Thursday.
Ken Bacon declined to specify what changes the
Kitty Hawk crew has made, but said they center on an "enhanced" response time in
which the carriers fighter planes will respond to flyovers.
The Washington Times reported Friday that the
crew took 40 minutes to get an airplane off the carrier a procedure the
papers sources said should take about 15 minutes. A Navy spokesman said the jet
scrambled within half an hour.
The changes were initiated by and involve only
the Kitty Hawk, and have not been implemented throughout the Navy, Bacon said.
He said Russian warplanes flew over the Kitty
Hawk three times in the Sea of Japan on Oct. 12, Oct. 17 and Nov. 9. He added they
were not a surprise to the Kitty Hawk crew, which had spotted the Russian jets when they
were 30 to 45 minutes away from the battle group.
Cmdr. Matt Brown, a spokesman for the 7th Fleet
Command in Yokosuka, Japan the Kitty Hawks home port said during the
Cold War these types of incidents might have raised an alarm. Today, they dont.
"We see Russian aircraft and Russian ships
that we see all the time," Brown said. "Were not in the Cold War anymore.
No one looked at this as being much of an incident."
Capt. Kevin Wensing, a spokesman for the
Commander in Chief Pacific Fleet, said during the Oct. 12 and Nov. 9 incidents the Russian
aircraft came only within several miles of the ship as it cruised in the northern Sea of
Japan, between the island of Hokkaido and the Russian mainland.
During the Oct. 17 incident, Wensing said, the
Kitty Hawk was in the midst of an underway replenishment in the same area. The Washington
Times, quoting unnamed Navy sources, said the two Russian aircraft an SU-24 Fencer
and an SU-27 Flanker buzzed the Kitty Hawks tower at an altitude of about 200
feet.
Wensing disputed the report. He said no one on
the ship is certain of the altitude, but it was at least "several hundred feet,"
and perhaps as much as 1,000 feet.
"It was certainly not 200 feet, and
certainly not buzzing the tower," he said.
At the time, Wensing said, the Kitty Hawk was on
"Alert-30" status, a relatively low level of alert he said would not be unusual
during peacetime in a part of the world now considered placid. That means that an aircraft
could be scrambled within 30 minutes to intercept an intruder.
"The ship, the battle group, decides what
kind of status they should be on," he said. "If youre in the middle of the
Persian Gulf, it would be a lot different than if you were in the middle of the Indian
Ocean."
Wensing said the intercept aircraft, F/A-18
Hornets, were delayed slightly because the Kitty Hawk was refueling with another ship. But
he said the aircraft still scrambled within the 30-minute guideline.
"We tracked (the Russian jets) from right
after they had taken off," Wensing said. "The F/A-18s took off, met up with them
and escorted them out of the area."
Following the Oct. 17 flyover, the Russians
tweaked the Americans by e-mailing photographs of the carriers deck and its
warplanes directly to the Kitty Hawk crews webmaster through the ships Web
site, Wensing acknowledged.
Bacon said the Pentagon has not filed any
protest with the Russian government and has no plans to do so. Wensing said the Navy could
file an INCSEA (incident at sea) report under a Cold War-era treaty with the former Soviet
Union, but Pentagon officials did not consider the matter to be a violation.
The practice of flyovers by both the United
States and the former Soviet Union was used quite frequently during the Cold War. However,
the routine all but stopped when the conflict between the nations ended more than a decade
ago.
Since then, the two nations have written
agreements to deal with incidents of ship-to-ship contact, however the agreements
dont spell out anything about flyovers, Bacon said.
"They did not violate any agreement,"
Bacon said of the Russian pilots, said to be on routine training to test the responses of
U.S. forward-deployed surveillance.
Last week, Bacon suggested that some faction of
the Russian Air Force is still waging the Cold War to explain the decision of military
officials in Moscow to hold a press conference and release photographs from the flyovers,
taken laterally from several thousand feet away from the Kitty Hawk.
Bacon has said the Russians have been active
with recent aircraft deployments and have moved planes into Siberia in eastern Russia and
near the Bering Sea across from Alaska.
"The Russians are our friends,
basically," Wensing said. "If it were 1960, it would be a different sort of
scenario. But its 2000."
Back
to December's stories
Stories from November
Stories from October
Stories from August and September
Stories before August
Home |